Showing posts with label leon panetta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leon panetta. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Obama's Scorched Earth Policy - How long does he think he can get away with it?

Well, being the pathological narcissist that he is - FOREVER! Unfortunately for Obama, he is in for a very rude awakening one of these days.

Right now, Obama is flaunting his power. He's in everyone's face, about everything. Nothing is sacred to him except his agenda. He openly taunts his distractors and challenges them to oppose him, but with his subtle threats that they may not want to go down that road.

Obviously this question doesn't apply to those of us who voted against him, but to those that voted for him, "Is this what you really thought you were going to get?" If it is, and you're happy with it, then you reside in the same disgusting category that he does.
Rees

from Real Clear Politics
May 5, 2009
By Jack Kelly

The CIA's Fight With Obama

Has Barack Obama made an enemy who can sabotage his presidency?

The presidency of George W. Bush began to unravel when some in high positions at the Central Intelligence Agency began waging a covert campaign against him.

It began in the summer of 2003 when officials at the CIA asked the Justice department to open a criminal investigation into who had disclosed to columnist Robert Novak that Valerie Plame, wife of controversial former diplomat Joseph Wilson, worked at the CIA.

The officials knew at the time the Intelligence Identities Protection Act did not apply to Ms. Plame, who'd been out of the field for more than five years.

Another blow was struck with the publication in 2004 of the book "Imperial Hubris" by Michael Scheuer, who'd headed the bin Laden desk during the Clinton administration. It was harshly critical of the Bush administration's conduct of the war on terror in general, and the invasion of Iraq in particular.

Never before had a serving officer been allowed to publish such a book.

The CIA typically slow-rolled and censored books even by retired CIA directors.

"Why did the CIA allow such a controversial book to be published in the first place?" asked attorney Mark Zaid, who specializes in national security law. "There is simply no question that the CIA could have prevented the publication of Scheuer's book if it had wanted to do so. And no court would have sided with him."

Why would some at the CIA want to sabotage President Bush? One motive might have been to deflect blame for intelligence failures. The CIA confidently had predicted Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. But none were found. The tactical intelligence the CIA provided to the U.S. military forces invading Iraq proved nearly worthless. And the CIA was caught flat-footed by the insurgency that developed several months after Saddam's fall.

There may have been a simpler motive. The novelist Charles McCarry was a deep cover CIA operative for ten years. "I never met a stupid person in the agency," he said in a 2004 interview. "Or an assassin. Or a Republican."

The CIA's war against President Bush was motivated by ass covering, or by political partisanship. But with President Obama, it's personal.

Many are furious about his disclosure of explicit details of the interrogation methods used on some al Qaida bigwigs, and his waffling on whether or not those who employed them will be subject to prosecution.

Others are incensed by his decision to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, and to let some of those incarcerated there (17 Chinese Uighurs) loose in the United States.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi held two hush hush meetings with CIA Director Leon Panetta and Democratic members of the Intelligence Committee last week.

"Her fear and frustration have apparently given way to panic after word reached her of the CIA's reaction to the damage she, President Obama and other Democrats have done to the spy agency in the last three months, wrote Jed Babbin, a former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, in Human Events May 1. "Pelosi learned that her actions and those of President Obama have so damaged CIA morale that the agency's ability to function could be in danger."

The upshot of the meetings was an unprecedented letter from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex) to Mr. Panetta, making a quasi-apology. Rep. Reyes asked the CIA director to "disseminate it to the CIA workforce as soon as possible."

But the CYA nature of the letter, and Mr. Reyes' pledge of more oversight are unlikely to mollify many at Langley.

Other Western intelligence services regard the Obama administration with contempt and rising concern, an officer of the DGSE, France's military intelligence agency, told my friend Jack Wheeler (the real life Indiana
Jones) last week.

"All of us in our little community are worried -- us, our friends in Berlin, London, Tel Aviv," the DGSE officer told Jack. "It is not like the barbarians at the gates. It is every barbarian horde in the world being told there are no gates."
Click to read the rest of the article and the comments

Monday, April 20, 2009

Obama acts to calm CIA crisis

Obama made a point to get in front of the TV cameras again today, with a live broadcast of his speech at CIA Headquarters. All Obama, all the time!
Rees

from the DEBKAfile
Special Report
April 21, 2009

President Barack Obama paid his first visit to Central Intelligence Agency headquarters at Langley, Virginia, Monday, April 20, to assure its staff that their work was "more important than ever." This morale-booster, unusually broadcast live, came after the criticism voiced by former agency director Gen. Michael Hayden of the president's decision last week to release memos which bared harsh CIA methods for extracting information from terrorists.

They included "waterboarding", week-long sleep deprivation, forced nudity and painful positions.

Obama assured the agency staff he stood behind them and America needed them more than ever before as his administration prepared for foreign policy changes.

He decided to release the memos, he said, because much of their content had already leaked, but also because he believed America must uphold the rule of law and the nation's values in its continued fight against terror.

Hayden said in a Fox News interview that the release would make it more difficult to get useful information from suspected terrorists. "I think that teaching our enemies our outer limits, by taking techniques off the table, we have made it more difficult… for CIA officers to defend the nation," he said.

He also denied that such methods were ineffective.

"The facts of the case are that the use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It really did work," said the ex-Director of Central Intelligence.

DEBKAfile's counter-terror sources stresses five features of President Obama's Langley appearance:
1. He most probably responded to an appeal from the new Central Agency Director Leon Panetta to boost plunging morale and counter the memos' destructive impact on the agency's anti-terror operations..
2. He knew that Hayden was speaking for many key members of the agency's top echelon.
3. Continuing debate and controversy over CIA methods would encourage al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations to accelerate their plans for striking the US.
4. A close Obama adviser, David Axelrod earlier answered Hayden's charges by asserting the White House's confidence that it had all the information necessary for thwarting terrorist strikes.
DEBKAfile's sources stress: It is no secret that the US administration has long suffered from a shortage of solid intelligence on terrorist activities and plans. The president therefore needed to countermand Axelrod's assertion before it was refuted.
5. President Obama was confronted by a skeptical audience. While promising to protect them, he was not specific on how CIA staffers were to be shielded against domestic or international prosecution for torture practices, possibly even by a UN body.

CIA operatives, while not averse to prosecuting the war of terror "within the rule of law," have no illusions about their chances of victory within these limitations.
Click to read the rest of the article