Hey Obama! You obviously don't even know what a Supreme Court Justice does

from the blog Dear Mr. President
Friday, May 1, 2009

Dear Mr. President: Please leave your cluelessly idiotic hands off the Supreme Court

Mr. President, I get that so far you've been totally incompetent in handling our economy, our domestic policies, our foreign policies and your choices for staff and cabinet.

But for you to come out and spew this garbage:

I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book. It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people's lives -- whether they can make a living and care for their families; whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.

I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving as just decisions and outcomes

You make me think that perhaps whatever law school you attended (Matchbook Cover Law School?) should give you a complete refund... with interest.

Words almost fail me as to how moronic such a bizarre perspective could possibly be.

Let me help you, idiot stick: Supreme Court Justices have precisely ONE function: and that is to interpret that law while determining it's Constitutionality.

There is no place for "empathy." There is no place for "hopes and struggles." There is, in fact, no place for "just decisions and outcomes."

You fricking idiot; you're even politicizing the US SUPREME COURT!

I'm astounded that you must have missed the first day of Constitutional Law 101 at Matchbook U.

You would put people on the bench not based on their academic and legal qualifications, but instead, by how much they reflect YOUR moronic view of the law, which clearly doesn't extend beyond a series of suggestions that YOU can ignore whenever the mood strikes.

To paraphrase someone relatively close to you, for the first time in my life I'm ashamed of my country because they saw fit to elect a complete ignoramus like you.
Click to read the article and the comments

Here is a post from the blog Power Line

A lawless president looks for a lawless Supreme Court Justice
May 1, 2009
Posted by Paul at 7:13 PM

President Obama made a short statement about the retirement of Justice Souter in which he outlined what he will be looking for in Souter's replacement. He stated, in part:

I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book. It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people's lives -- whether they can make a living and care for their families; whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.

I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving as just decisions and outcomes

(emphasis added)

By indicating that his concern is not just with just decisions but also just outcomes, Obama reveals the lawless quality of his thinking. The legitimate function of a judge is to reach just decisions, full stop. Once judges, or the president who appoints them, start thinking about just outcomes, we are well down the path to judicial tyranny. And once just outcomes are defined as those that display empathy for "the people," we could be starting down the road to banana republic status.

Obama apparently wants outcomes that will make people feel welcome in their own nation. It's not clear to me what he's referring to here. But whatever it is, the extent to which people feel welcome must be determined by how their neighbors view them and, to the extent (limited, one hopes) the law becomes involved, the rights and benefits conferred by the language of the laws in question.

If Obama wants to appoint a Justice who has run or worked in a soup kitchen, that's fine. But it looks to me like he wants to appoint a Justice who will reach outcomes that establish "soup kitchens" regardless of whether that's the best view of the legal provision he or she is interpreting.

Expect the worst, not just from this judicial nomination but from all subsequent ones.
Posted by Just a guy at 8:19 PM
Click to read the Power Line article and the comments